loading…
Market prices/Compare/gpt-5.6-terra-vs-muse-spark-1.1
Live inference pricing, quoted by competing providers on the Omnious market.
Neither model has a live ask in this snapshot, so there is no price to compare yet.
GPT 5.6 Terra ranks higher on the independent quality index, #6 against #8.
Neither class answered with a live book just now. Either nobody is quoting them at this moment or the market feed could not be read. Prices on Omnious exist only as live quotes, so the comparison fills back in on the next refresh.
Prices are USDC per 1M tokens unless the row says otherwise. A dot marks the cheaper, faster or higher-ranked cell. Figures the market has not produced read n/a.
| Metric | GPT 5.6 Terra | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Best ask · inputper 1M tokens, USDC | n/a | n/a |
| Best ask · outputper 1M tokens, USDC | n/a | n/a |
| Cost of one request10,000 input + 1,000 output tokens, at the best asks above | n/a | n/a |
| Blended · 3:1 input:outputper 1M tokens at three input tokens per output token | n/a | n/a |
| Cleared p50 · outputmedian price settled requests actually paid | n/a | n/a |
| Time to first token · p50router-measured median | n/a | n/a |
| Time to first token · p95the tail, not the typical case | n/a | n/a |
| Output throughput · p50tokens per second | n/a | n/a |
| Fill rateserved / attempted | n/a | n/a |
| Live quote depthasks on the book now | n/a | n/a |
| Providers competingdistinct providers that served in the window | n/a | n/a |
| Context · minsmallest window across live quotes | n/a | n/a |
| Context · maxlargest window across live quotes | n/a | n/a |
| Cached inputpublished cache rate, per 1M tokens | n/a | n/a |
| Issuer | n/a | n/a |
| Quality percentilereviewed independent general-quality index | 98.4 (better) | 97.8 |
| Quality rankposition in the same reviewed cohort of 322, 1 = best | #6 (better) | #8 |
Every anonymized ask quoted for each class right now. The best ask in the table above is the bottom of these ladders.
No provider is quoting GPT 5.6 Terra in this book snapshot.
No provider is quoting Muse Spark 1.1 in this book snapshot.
Each class across seven task shapes, from routing the router has observed. An axis with no observation is left open and labelled N/A, never drawn as a zero.
Fit n/a
7 axes have no observation for GPT 5.6 Terra, so they are left open instead of plotted at zero.
Fit n/a
7 axes have no observation for Muse Spark 1.1, so they are left open instead of plotted at zero.
Omnious has no price list. Providers quote input and output rates per million tokens in USDC, and every request is an RFQ: the quotes competing for that model class enter a live scoring auction that weighs quoted price against router-measured latency and reliability.
The winner clears under second-score/3 rules. It is paid a price capped by the next genuine rival's score, so quoting low to win and billing high is structurally impossible. Settlement is pay-as-you-go USDC on the actual token counts of the response, and every response carries a signed, verifiable receipt.
Every figure on these pages is therefore a reading of the market at a point in time: the best asks on the book, and the average cleared prices of requests that settled. They move whenever the market does.
One OpenAI-compatible key reaches both GPT 5.6 Terra and Muse Spark 1.1. Switch between them per request, settle in USDC on actual usage, and keep a signed receipt for each response.
Get an API key Try the chatOr read either model on its own: GPT 5.6 Terra pricing·Muse Spark 1.1 pricing·all comparisons